At the end of the year we decided to head out for lunch and discuss the year’s readings.
We dined at Stoneridge Cafe in the Moutere countryside and discussed our favourite scenes, literary devices, characters and fictional love interests. And, we came up with following:
Book of the year:
Rachel: The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle
Suzy: Catcher In The Rye
Nadine: Life Of Pi
Runner up best book:
Rachel: Atonement
Suzy: Atonement
Nadine: The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle
(Haha and from what I remember, Nadine’s husband made us *awesome* bookclub bookmarks – Suzy)
In 2007 we began our Bookerthon journey. We’d kept up to date with Man Bookers of the past and we’d shared thoughts and comments. In 2007 there were a couple of attractions to the shortlist. First of all Lloyd Jones, a New Zealander, featured upon it. Secondly, another of the contenders was one of our favourite authors, Ian McEwan. It seemed logical to keep reading. Someone had the idea to read them all before the winner was announced. The other announced “it will be like a Booker-thon”.
And just like that, history was made!
In picking our winner, we considered the following categories: readability, significance and style. Who knew if that was how the judges based their critiques also, but from our novice point of view, it seemed logical enough.
The thing that hit us in our first Bookerthon was the way in which extraordinary characters took control of the narratives and forced themselves into our lives. It was as if these authors knew a likeable protagonist or lead character of the past was not enough anymore. To be recognised, their book needed an extravagant leading figure, who would entertain, horrify and mesmorise us.
First, in Darkmans there is a jester who haunts the pages and forces the characters to speak unexpectedly and act with comedic or shocking outbursts. In Animal’s People a boy deformed from a chemical disaster walks on all fours and abuses passers by with language like you’ve never heard. On Chesil Beach introduces a privileged, well-to-do young couple on their honeymoon who speak of nothing but their inability to make love. At the other end of the scale is Mister Pip, in which an English teacher wears a red clown’s nose and tows his wife about in a trolley in Bouganville reading Great Expectations to native children during a conflict. Depressed Irishman Liam Hegatry takes his life in The Gathering, but wears a high-vis vest so his body can easily be located in the turbulent waters of the local river. And a nameless American in The Reluctant Fundamentalist questions a Pakistani living in New York who admits he smiled when the Trade Towers came down.
This cast was a brain explosion of character development and relationships, with idiosyncrasies, troubles and societal beliefs not so prevalent in one’s every day reading. The Man Booker Prize delivered in ways we had not predicted, in the expansion of our understanding of people, of types of people, of all people, far and wide. The shortlist might be called the best six books of the year but to us they were the best representation of the state of the world and the state of literature at that moment.
After this appreciation, we knuckled down to our evening of judging. Wine, a cheeseboard, six revelatory books later we concluded: five of the six to have qualities worthy of winning: Mister Pip, The Reluctant Fundamentalist and Animal’s People are all profound and human, set amongst real-life atrocities, and Darkmans is a detailed and unique story. On Chesil Beach is from the master himself, and while we do both respect his genius, we have differing views of where this one sits in the shortlist favourites order.
The book we did not think was a contender was The Gathering. Yes it spoke to families, to mental health, to discovery. And we agreed the misery was complete and all-encompassing and therefore stylistically impressive. However, something so dreary failed our readability criteria and couldn’t make enough gains in the other two categories.
In the end we both picked our favourites for the same reasons: slap-in-the-face reality, highly developed characters, unputdownable readability and the promotion of a cause through a fictionalised truth. So for Rachel it was Animal’s People and for Suzy Mister Pip.
Best book 1-6: Rachel:
Animal’s People
Mister Pip
The Reluctant Fundamentalist
On Chesil Beach
Darkmans
The Gathering
Best book 1-6: Suzy:
Mister Pip
On Chesil Beach
Animal’s People
Darkmans
The Reluctant Fundamentalist
The Gathering
READ FOR BOOKERTHON
In this novella a newly married couple reflect on their pasts and as a result question their marriage while honeymooning on Chesil Beach.
⚈ “The opening line of On Chesil Beach sums up the rest of the content: ‘They were young, educated, and both virgins on this, their wedding night, and they lived in a time when conversation about sexual difficulties was plainly impossible.’
“It is 1962, the cusp of the sexual revolution, and two very English characters are contemplating the role of sex in their newly declared marriage. There are many factors that contribute to their differing views, not contained to the time and place, but also societal class systems and other goings on in their familial histories.
“The real-life Chesil Beach in Dorset, on the south-west coast of England, is alive and relevant to the storyline. The beach is one of the few shingle beaches in the UK. Its view of the ocean and rocky composition represent both openness but also difficulty/slippery footing associated with reaching that openness.”
A sudden space began to open out, not only between Edward and his mother, but also between himself and his immediate circumstances, and he felt his own being, the buried core of it he had never attended to before, come to sudden, hard-edged existence, a glowing pinpoint that he wanted no-one else to know about.
⚈ “While I am an Ian McEwan fan of the highest order, On Chesil Beach left me wanting. There was his usual mastery of prose but somehow it seemed too easy. I’m being critical, obviously, because even a bad Ian McEwen book would be better than many texts on the bookshop shelves!, but I guess being the huge fan that I am means I am being extra tough on him. Don’t get me wrong, it is still a great read, I just didn’t feel overwhelmed with fervour and emotion as I have with his other masterpieces. Edit: Now years later, I look back on this book with fondness and admiration. Without a re-read. I’m not sure what changed but it’s funny how hindsight and time to reflect can change one’s opinions.” – Rachel
—–
Published 2007
Jonathan Cape
166 pages
READ FOR BOOKERTHON
In the world of Mister Pip, reading Dickens represents salvation for a community ravaged by conflict.
⚈ “Lloyd Jones’s novel is set in a village on the Papua New Guinean island of Bougainville during the 1990s civil war. Jones covered it as a journalist, and in his novel he never shies away from the realities of daily life shadowed by violence. Matilda, the 13-year-old narrator, details how the helicopters circle, the generators are empty and all the teachers have fled.
“One white man remains. Mr Watts believes in the power of literature to set minds free. He reads the children Great Expectations and in it they find something just as vital as medicine and kerosene: ‘a bigger piece of the world’. Like many readers before her, Matilda falls in love with the fictional Pip, but ‘Pip’ is mistakenly assumed by soldiers to be a rebel fighter and then the boundary between fiction and reality dissolves.
I had found a new friend. The surprising thing is where I’d found him – not up a tree or sulking in the shade, or splashing around in one of the hill streams, but in a book. No one had told us kids to look there for a friend. Or that you could slip inside the skin of another. Or travel to another place with marshes, and where, to our ears, the bad people spoke like pirates.
⚈ “A clever, enthralling, devastating book.” – Suzy
⚈ “I enjoy books set in real life conflicts, to be educated/shocked and entertained all at once. Here Jones takes a little known conflict and into it inserts fabulous characters. The protagonist, Matilda, and the re-invented Pip are both fully developed characters who bring innocence and a harsh reality to the real-life conflict. I enjoyed not only the harsh differences but also the parallels between story telling and war. A touching and haunting book with snippets I had to read from behind my hands. An important book; one not to be forgotten.” – Rachel
—–
Published 2006
John Murray
256 pages
READ FOR BOOKERTHON
A jester haunts this book, possessing the characters at inconvenient moments. They are a collection of interesting folk living in Ashby, England. An erratic, embitted old man; a drug dealer; a chiropodist with mysterious bruises; a man with schizophrenia; a boy building matchstick cathedrals.
The jester is the weight of history bearing down upon them, he is the language that links past and present. He is a prank puller and the instigator of many comedic moments in this book that celebrates life in all its glory, both uneasy and honest.
⚈ “This book was a bit mad but I loved it. It was a massive commitment during a Bookerthon due to the length but definitely worth it.” – Suzy
⚈ “This was an epic read and there was a lot going on, but it was quite different to most novels (right down to the font!) and that made it intriguing. As two families go about their daily business, which is identifiable to us all, there is a ghostly jester who haunts the book, forcing characters to say weird things and moving items about in true supernatural style. You certainly had to be invested in the 800-odd pages to get the most out of it. It was tough to give it the attention it deserved due to time restraints with our Bookerthon reading, so I’d recommend picking up this book when your reading time is ample.” – Rachel
—–
Published 2007
Fourth Estate
848 pages
READ FOR BOOKERTHON
In 1984 Union Carbide released 40 tonnes of lethal gas from its pesticide factory into the city of Bhopal in India, killing thousands and contaminating drinking water. Indra Sinha writes of this atrocity in Animal’s People, replacing Bhopal with the fiction city of Khaufpur.
He even creates and promotes in the book a website about “Khaufpur,” to which he allocates Bhopal’s history, where the residents are his characters and the journalist revealing events is a female version of himself.
In the book Animal is a man who has been deformed from the chemical leak and as a result walks on all fours. Though cynical and bitter he retains many enjoyable and relatable characteristics including a romantic side. The history of the city and the people are detailed alongside the story of Animal who attempts to protect the woman he loves and also spy on American doctors whom many do not trust.
At the end of time when God judges us humans, I just hope He remembers to judge Himself as well.
⚈ “This book was so evocative. Years later, when I think of it I still feel overwhelmed with memories of the noise and colour.” – Suzy
⚈ “I had never heard of the Bhopal Disaster before reading this book. And it is so outrageous that even as I read I kept thinking surely this is not real? I appreciated how Sinha relayed the facts in a fictional style to give them more weight. I also enjoyed how he treated Animal as a normal person – with thoughts and desires, friends, enemies and love interests – despite his severe deformities and homelessness. It’s what made this book affecting and memorable. Not only does it educate people about the disaster but it reminds us that whatever our circumstances and outward presentation we are all the same inside.” – Rachel
—–
Published 2007
Simon & Schutster
374 pages
READ FOR BOOKERTHON
Liam Hegarty has drowned himself a river. He is one of 12 siblings who all like to drink, though he was afflicted more than the rest. His family, a large, Irish kin, come together for the funeral. His sister Veronica narrates events, grieving for her brother but also attempting to unravel the causes of the family’s dysfunction.
There is something wonderful about a death, how everything shuts down, and all the ways you thought you were vital are not even vaguely important… and it is just as you suspected – most of the stuff that you do is just stupid, really stupid, most of the stuff you do is just nagging and whining and picking up for people who are too lazy to love you.
“For us both, the endless misery in The Gathering put a veil over the whole reading experience, making it impossible to see what distinguished this as a book worthy of Booker nomination. There is no sentimentality and no joy. If that’s what Enright was after, she has done well, but that didn’t translate into reader appeal for either of us.”
—–
Published 2007
Random House
272 pages
Recent Comments