READ FOR BOOKCLUB
Chosen by Sally
In 2014 a great poem is read aloud and never heard again. For generations, people speculate about its message, but no copy has yet been found. In 2119 the lowlands of the UK have been submerged by rising seas. Those who survive are haunted by the richness of the world that has been lost. Academic Tom Metcalfe pores over archives of the early twenty-first century, captivated by the freedoms and possibilities of human life at its zenith.
I’d like to shout down through a hole in the ceiling of time and advise the people of a hundred years ago: If you want your secrets kept, whisper them into the ear of your dearest, most trusted friend. Do not trust the keyboard and screen. If you do, we’ll know everything.
Click the arrow to read each person’s full review
I ordered this book at the beginning of the year and read it when it arrived, which meant I had to re-read it for book group. I have to say, I enjoyed it more the second time through. I am a fan of his work, my favourite being Atonement, but I would say it is common for me to finish his books feeling like I have missed something. So it was here. First time around, I was absolutely consumed by the plot and probably raced through the text hoping for a miraculous ending. The ending is kind of miraculous, but it is not what I was expecting.
At the second reading, I spent much more time appreciating the cleverly constructed, dystopian world McEwan has constructed. Set in a post-apocalyptic world 100 years from now, sea levels have risen and most of the UK is flooded. Society as we know it has disintegrated. Food is scarce and restricted, technology limited, world trade has collapsed, global warming is in full flight. Details such as The Bodleian having been relocated to the top of Snowdon, having to drink acorn coffee and swimming with sea turtles in an area of England that would be miles from the sea on a current map painted a rich and quite plausible picture.
The main protagonist, Thomas Metcalfe is a lecturer in English Literature, obsessed with one specific poem written before the apocalypse. The other major character is Vivien, for whom the poem was written. A whole other cast of characters swirls around the missing poem and Thomas’s hunt for it. For me this novel is about nostalgia and memory and how both are imperfect sciences. All the characters around at the time of the poem’s creation have different views and feelings regarding the so-called masterpiece. We as readers have much more insight than Thomas who, 100 years on, yearns to find the missing manuscript and share it with the present day. The title of the book What We Can Know should be followed by the subtitle “Is Not Very Much” as the passage of time, inaccurate reporting and rose-tinted spectacles all have a part in this story.
There is a hefty feminist current in this book with two wonderfully intelligent women wreaking exquisite, bloodless revenge on their egotistical husbands. The more I consider this book, the more layers I find, and my recommendation would be to savour it, think about it, do not rush it. A basic knowledge of British geography would make a difference to your appreciation of the world McEwan has created.
I’ve read everything Ian McEwan has written, he’s been one of my favourite writers for a long time, and I really value how his fiction has developed. Every one of his books has a compelling plot, but also an important message. From the unsettling and psychological to humanity to civilisations, McEwan always has an astute response to the world that challenges me to ponder and Google and keep reading without making me feel like I’m completely out of my academic depth. I really appreciate how he respects the reader’s intelligence but still teaches us stuff.
The most affecting moment for me in What We Can Know is when Tom Metcalfe and his contemporaries look back on 2014 as the peak of human civilisation, a time of freedom, abundance, biodiversity, easy travel and material comfort, before climate change, political instability, pandemics, wars and rising seas. A time before “the Derangement”, when people understood the climate threat but collectively failed to respond. This message really hit home and gave me a lot to think about in terms of preserving history and protecting what we have while we have it.
McEwan wraps these ideas in a story full of murder, lovers, affairs and all the indecencies of any good plot. To be honest I found it a little slow to get going, but once the pieces are in place the narrative gathers momentum and it held my attention throughout. I think this is another of McEwan’s works that will endure and stay in the history books.
Ian McEwan masterfully weaves two contrasting storylines: one set at the dawn of the 21st century, and the other 100 years in the future where a climate-ravaged world is surviving but with out the luxuries we currently enjoy, some food sources have been wiped out and the world has been flooded by a rising tide. I enjoyed reading McEwan’s future world, he made it sound very plausible.
The narrative revolves around a missing corona that Francis, a brilliant poet, famously read to a tight-knit circle of friends at a 2014 dinner party. The poem vanished after that night. One hundred years into the future Thomas Metcalfe, a literary scholar, romanticises about the 21st century as a “golden age”. His ultimate obsession is recovering that missing poem, A Corona for Vivien. This fixation alienates him from his pragmatic colleague and former partner, Rose who constantly challenges his idealised view of history. Thomas’s character is a mix of engaging and pitiful, more pitiful though as he obsesses over century-old emails that Vivian Blundy wrote and sometimes talks to the idea of her.
The past timeline introduces us to Vivien and her complex life. She is a deeply flawed character; who McEwan has done a great job of developing. She balances being a caretaker for her first husband, Percy (a gentle violin maker suffering from early-onset Alzheimer’s), with her turbulent second marriage to Francis. Vivien handles her chaotic life by engaging in numerous affairs. Personally, I didn’t gel with her; I found her weak and difficult to root for, though the sheer number of affairs definitely hints at a deeper thematic meaning about human connection.
If you love intricate character studies and literary mysteries, this is well worth the read.
This is the first Ian McEwan novel I have read and I enjoyed it overall, however it wasn’t a perfect read for me. I found the writing beautiful, and appreciated the thoughtful exploration of memory, truth and how we make sense of the past. The mystery kept me interested, but fell a bit flat with the pacing slow at times.
What I liked least was the amount of infidelity in the story. It felt more prominent then I expected, and I found it distracting and frustrating rather then adding much to the novel. I also struggled to connect emotionally with some of the characters. Even so, the book gave me plenty to think about, and I’d recommend it to readers who enjoy literacy fiction with big ideas.
What We Can Know is a cleverly written dystopian novel that explores climate change, memory, and the fragility of history. The significance of the missing poem and what Tom tried to discover shows how history can be highly speculative, often based on educated guesses rather than anything truly concrete.
The novel unfolds gradually, and I liked how the first part, which initially felt quite speculative, became much clearer after reading the second part. Once the real story emerged, it gave the earlier sections much more meaning.
One of the ideas that stayed with me was the question of what would happen if a major global event occurred today. Would we lose much of our history, especially when so much of our lives exists only in digital form? The disappearance of the poem serves as a powerful metaphor for how difficult it can be to preserve cultural artefacts in our data-heavy world.
By the end of the novel, I was left reflecting on our planet’s future and the possibility of losing not only the environment but also the stories, knowledge, and history that define us. It is a thoughtful and thought-provoking read.
Published 2025
Knopf
303 pages
READ FOR BOOKCLUB
Chosen by Jodie
Published in 1952 and set against the rise of fascism and the Second World War in Italy, All Our Yesterdays explores how history unfolds through ordinary lives rather than extraordinary events. Natalia Ginzburg examines family, love, duty and the compromises people make as the world around them drastically changes.
He told her that up till that day she had lived like an insect. An insect that knows nothing beyond the leaf upon which it hangs.
Click the arrow to read each person’s full review
Natalia Ginzburg’s All Our Yesterdays is a novel that stayed with me long after I finished it. What I enjoyed most was her style of writing. It’s plain, direct, and completely free of unnecessary drama, yet it manages to convey so much emotion. I also loved her dry humour. Even during tragic or difficult moments, there is often a subtle comedic edge that feels very human and true to life.
Ginzburg’s writing is simple and understated, which is something I really appreciate. Rather than focusing on heroic events or larger-than-life characters, she writes about ordinary family life, relationships, and the small decisions that shape people’s lives. The story unfolds against the backdrop of wartime Italy, but the focus remains firmly on the everyday experiences of her characters.
Some readers may find her style too simple, but I think that’s where her strength lies. Beneath the straightforward language is an enormous amount of emotional depth. She captures loneliness, love, disappointment, and resilience with remarkable honesty. The emotions are never overstated, which somehow makes them even more powerful.
For me, All Our Yesterdays was a thoughtful and deeply moving novel that demonstrates how much can be said with seemingly simple prose.
As a fan of Ginzburg’s novellas I was keen to read one of her full length novels. All Our Yesterdays has the same rolling, off-hand, over-the-fence style narrative that feels like someone recounting gossip. In a novella it adds to the snappy, fragmentary style revelations that keep the pace and intrigue up. Initially, I wasn’t convinced it worked as well in a full length novel. I felt one step removed from the action, like I wasn’t in the midst of it observing everything first hand.
But as the war setting intensified and people’s lives became a series of hurried conversations exchanged on street corners, I began to appreciate how well suited this style was. Life, especially in wartime, changes in an instant and there is little time to ponder, dramatise and eulogise over individual events when your community is under siege. The more I read, the more the book and vast cast of characters grew on me and in the end I felt that All Our Yesterdays was an authentic portrayal of Italian war life. As Ginzburg lived through this time herself it’s no surprise the plot and characters seem so realistic. I particularly liked the last section where the pace heightens and all the hearsay comes to shocking fruition.
It took me a while, about halfway through, to start enjoying this one. Natalia Ginzburg’s literal style was initially quite hard to read, mostly because none of her characters actually speak. Instead, the book is written as if someone is telling the story in a gossipy way, a style I have never come across before! On reflection, though, it perfectly suits the feel of the novel. The story is set across several small Italian villages and towns, the exact kinds of places where everyone makes it their business to know what everyone else is doing.
The plot strolls along at a semi-slow pace, introducing the dynamics of the primary family and the family next door. Interestingly, neither family is given a surname; they clearly have them, but Ginzburg chooses not to use them. She also avoids using first names for certain characters, like Anna’s father, who is simply called “the old man,” or Anna’s daughter, who is referred to as “the little girl.” By omitting these names, I never actually formed a picture in my mind of what the characters looked like, which was a unique experience for me as a reader. Despite the slow pace, several life-changing events are delivered in an almost matter-of-fact way. These were the parts I had to re-read just to process the full impact of what was happening. Ultimately, Ginzburg’s vocabulary offers a deeply personal, human viewpoint of this historical era one in which she lived through.
While I enjoyed the book on its own, it truly came alive for me once I learned more about the author herself.
This classic war novel follows two families who live opposite each other in a small town. The cast of characters includes all the family members, their servants, their friends, village luminaries such as the police sergeant and the chemist, the local Marchesa, peasant farmers, refugee Jews and the village cripple. We even have an insight into the thoughts of a disillusioned young German soldier. In short, we see the situation through the eyes of every level of society and political persuasion. Despite many reviews leaning towards the youngest daughter, Anna, as the main protagonist, I didn’t feel there was a main protagonist but rather a whole tapestry of stories, each intertwining with the others and affecting them differently.
As the story progresses, we learn who amongst the characters can rise above the pressures, depravations and loss of war and who crumbles. Perhaps even more moving though, are the characters who neither rise nor crumble but just grind a way through the hell of the occupation and survive.
Ginzberg’s style was off-putting to me at first. She often uses very long sentences, lots of comma breaks and repetition within the same sentence. It’s not that these long sentences are hard to follow, the opposite. The word that came to mind for me was that she was prattling, almost gossiping. A lot of the text sounded to me as if it was being recited over the fence by one nosy neighbour to another. Once I had packaged it like that, it felt authentic in that it reflected the small-town relationships, mentalities and events that are the fibre of the whole novel. Because it was such a rapid-fire style, I did feel she lost the impact that one of the more serious events should have had on me as a reader.
This book would make a great film, and as an aside, my copy of the novel has a fabulous photo on the front by the great American photographer Ruth Orkin. It will be a serious runner for our “Book Cover the Year” award. Titled “Jinx and Justin – Florence 1951”, do yourself a favour and go down a rabbit hole looking up both Orkin and Jinx (real name Ninalee Craig).
I absolutely loved All Our Yesterdays and could not put it down. The novel follows the lives of two interconnected families as they navigate love, loss, family tensions, and the gradual intrusion of history into their everyday lives. While the book is undoubtedly shaped by war, fascism, politics, and the major historical events of the period, for me it’s true strength lies in its intimate portrayal of ordinary people.
Ginzburg writes with remarkable sensitivity, capturing the small moments and relationships that define her characters just as much as the larger events unfolding around them. The novel feels deeply human, showing how history is experienced not through headlines and military campaigns, but through families, friendships, marriages, and personal struggles.
The second half of the novel contains some incredibly heartbreaking events as the realities of war arrive on the characters’ doorstep. These moments are handled with emotional honesty and restraint, making them all the more powerful. In particular, Anna emerges as a memorable protagonist. Faced with profound tragedy and disappointment, she demonstrates quiet strength and resilience, adapting to circumstances beyond her control.
What stayed with me most was the way experiences of war do not simply end when peace arrives; they become woven into the characters’ identities and relationships, influencing the lives they build afterwards.
‘And they laughed a little and were friendly together, the three of them, Anna,
Emanuele and Giustino; and they were pleased to be together, the three of them, thinking of the dead, and of the long war and the sorrow and noise and confusion, and of the long difficult life which they saw in front of them now, full of all the things they did not know how to do’.
By the final page, I felt as though I had lived alongside these families and witnessed a significant chapter of their lives. A beautifully written novel which I highly recommend and give a 10 out of 10.
First published in 1952 in Italian
Translated in 1956 by Angus Davidson
Giulio Einaudi Editore
300 pages
READ FOR BOOKCLUB
Chosen by Tessa
Set in 1985 Auckland, this novel follows an 11 year old boy named Obi who is on the cusp of teenagehood but has a maturity shaped by poverty, dysfunctional family dynamics, (dis)organised crime and violence. His dad’s delusional, his mum’s sick, the Rainbow Warrior just exploded, and Obi is looking for a way to make quick money. An electric novel about life in a multi-cultural, counter-cultural part of Auckland pre-gentrification.
The smell of graffiti and sunburn, empty stomachs and pockets stuffed with other people’s treasure. Sewage when it rained, of fear, of knowing that reality hates its job, and that being a child is like being stupid on acid.
Click the arrow to read each person’s full review
I chose 1985 for our April book club as I wanted to include a New Zealand author, and the novel’s nomination for the Dublin Literary Awards caught my attention. I also hadn’t come across Dominic Hoey before, and the synopsis on the back cover intrigued me. I wasn’t disappointed—in fact, I really loved this book. For me, it carried a strong sense of nostalgia. Having grown up in Auckland, I found the setting and time period incredibly familiar, which made the story feel even more vivid and personal.
Hoey’s writing style is highly descriptive, and the short, fast-paced chapters made it an engaging and easy read. Each chapter left me wanting to continue, creating a strong sense of momentum throughout the book.
One of the novel’s strengths lies in its characters. They are deeply flawed—particularly the adults—but Hoey writes them with empathy and, at times, a surprising amount of warmth. Obi’s father, for example, is largely unreliable and constantly scheming for ways to make money without working. Yet he is not without redeeming qualities. Moments like when he teaches Obi to cook add depth to his character and show a different side to their relationship. These small glimpses of care make the characters feel real rather than one-dimensional. Despite the difficult circumstances depicted throughout the novel, I feel it remains inherently hopeful. It strikes a compelling balance between social commentary and a coming-of-age story, exploring hardship while still allowing space for growth, connection, and resilience.
That said, this isn’t a book I would recommend to everyone. The frequent use of strong language is a defining feature of the narrative voice and may not appeal to all readers. However, for those who don’t mind this, it adds authenticity to the story and its setting.
Overall, I found 1985 to be a compelling and evocative novel that blends gritty realism with moments of tenderness. It’s a powerful portrayal of place, family, and growing up, and one that resonated with me long after I finished.
There’s a real satisfaction in reading a novel deeply rooted in New Zealand history, society and culture. The settings, language and behavioural idiosyncrasies in this book offered a large dose of nostalgic sentiment. (I too played Spaceys in the fish & chip shop in 1985!) Even the darkly funny yet deeply empathetic narrative voice felt unmistakably Kiwi.
Within that cocoon of familiarity is a cast of characters balanced between strengths, flaws and misguided morals. I bonded quickly with Obi, his best mate Al and his sister Summer as well as some of the minor characters. I was conflicted about the parents as it felt like Hoey wanted us to forgive them too easily, despite the father’s poor role modelling and the mother’s indifference. But the fact I am spending so much time dissecting them means there has clearly been a lot of thought in how they were developed.
There is a simple plot, of Obi trying to save the family home via Spacey competitions and treasure maps, but ultimately this is a character study, and a very good one at that. I think 1985 should have been shortlisted for the NZ Book Awards.
What a great read! Hoey does a fantastic job of bringing a wide range of characters to life in this book. They all sit comfortably within the narrative, and even though some only make brief appearances, you get a real sense of who they are. They all share one thing in common: a desire to improve their lives.
The scale of these ambitions is wide-ranging, from petty theft and shifts at the bacon factory to dreams of directing movies or becoming the best Space Invaders player in town. Every character is looking for something more than what they currently have.
While there isn’t a traditional “action” plot, the story beautifully captures an eleven-year-old boy at the age of exploration and self-discovery. Seeing the world through his eyes gives the story a layer of innocence that slowly peels away. It’s a poignant journey as he eventually realises his father isn’t quite the hero he imagined him to be.
Hoey’s writing style is a total pleasure to read, I absolutely loved this book.
1985 is a heart-warming, tragi-comic biography in the same vein as Taika Waititi’s film Boy.
The central character Obi is navigating a childhood in poverty, with a father who is a petty criminal, frustrated poet and recidivist alcoholic. His mother’s life has been blighted by chronic illness (secondary to drug use) and despite a university education, she has seriously failed to achieve her potential. Despite their issues, both parents genuinely worship each other and love Obi and his sister Summer. It was painful to read about the constant lack of good food, the crime and gang violence all around them, the constant mold and dampness in their home, the pain of disappointment when Obi’s father disappoints him repeatedly. I also felt incredible tension related to Summer who is clearly disillusioned with her family but is seeking solace down all the wrong avenues.
One of the main themes in this book is having a dream or being a dreamer. For some it is a superpower and for others it is their downfall. Obi’s dream is to find buried treasure and save the family from losing their home.
I genuinely loved every character in this book. Despite their flaws, I forgave them because they each show a vulnerable side and are principled in their own misguided ways. Stand out for me is Al, Obi’s Samoan friend who is full of wise-cracks and cheek despite having been abandoned by both his parents to the care of an aunty and a large, extended family of cousins. The warmth and care that comes from within that home for both Al and Obi gave me warm fuzzies. I love that Al has the seemingly impossible dream of becoming a filmmaker.
This is a seriously New Zealand read, anchored as it is in Grey Lynn, Auckland in 1985. It references key political events in New Zealand such as the Springboks Tour, the Dawn Raids and the sinking of the Rainbow Warrier.
The theme of children trying to navigate the chaos and neglect inflicted on them by their carers is not a new one and is handled with insight and poignancy. I was filled with a sense of dread when the boys were stranded on the far side of the city late at night and yet they are taken in by some other wonderful characters. This is ultimately a hopeful book about the warmth of communities and the kindness of strangers, tempered by the gritty reality of crime, violence, substance abuse and hopeless poverty
I thank the author for leaving us with the sense that the boys ultimately do escape their childhoods, not altogether unscathed, but in some ways the stronger for it.
I really enjoyed reading 1985, mainly because the characters felt so authentic. Obi’s life was deeply flawed and dysfunctional, but Dominic Hoey writes him with so much honesty that I found him relatable and easy to care for. Even though I have never lived in Auckland or experienced the situations Obi has, being around a similar age to him in 1985 gave the novel a sense of nostalgia for me.
The book deals with sad and heavy themes, but it’s often told with humour and a sharp comedic style that made it feel realistic rather than overly dark. That balance between sadness and comedy worked well and made the story engaging the whole way through.
I also loved the sense of community throughout the novel. Even though the neighbourhood and people were rough around the edges, there was a feeling that everyone looked out for each other, which gave the story a lot of warmth.
Another highlight for me was the poetry and politics woven into the story. They added depth without ever feeling forced or preachy. Overall, I found 1985 to be funny, emotional, nostalgic, and very real. It’s the kind of novel where the characters and atmosphere stay with you long after finishing it.
Published 2025
Penguin Random House
288 pages
READ FOR BOOKCLUB
Chosen by Rachel
Described as a radical fusion of feminist theory and experimental horror, Girls Against God is a stream of consciousness narrative on censorship, magic, gender, art and rebellion against power systems.
I don’t know why I feel I have to be able to justify my actions … maybe it’s because it’s important to me that what we do should mean something, that language should be able to find different strategies and be something other than a machine for shame and denial … that we have to find society’s boundaries and transgress them in as many ways as possible, that we must highlight, study, analyse them, all the way down to the even the most low-minded crap.
Click the arrow to read each person’s full review
Girls Against God follows an unnamed narrator who grows up in 1990s Norway amongst strict Christian conservatism. She feels alienated and angry, and is drawn to black metal, gothicism and taboo ideas as a way to rebel and define herself. It is an abstract, stream-of-consciousness novel and I found it a provocative new way of looking at the female coming of age experience. It moves between topics like art, language and religion and more visceral ones like menstruation, pornography and bodily functions as the narrator and her friends replace religion with ritual, music and “witchcraft” ie collective identity. As the book progresses the boundaries between imagination, art and reality become increasingly surreal, with women imagined and real violently confronting the forces that seek to control women.
The multi genre book is philosophical, political, grotesque and radically feminist. Everything is vividly portrayed and deliberately provocative to make a point. I found parts uncomfortable or baffling to read but ultimately was happy to ride the wave of the main character’s meandering mind. I enjoyed the way conventional thinking was challenged and stopped often to underline beautifully written prose or to ponder the author’s controversial ideas and metaphorical intentions. I guess the book felt like a study project as well as a unique reading experience and I was okay with that.
I picked up Girls Against God but ended up DNFing it because I found it really hard to follow. The stream-of-consciousness style made it feel quite scattered, and I struggled to stay grounded in what was actually happening. That said, once I realised that was the intention, I could at least appreciate what the author was trying to do on a stylistic level. The book leans heavily into a very direct, almost confrontational feminist perspective. At times it felt a bit hard-nosed, like it was deliberately trying to shock or unsettle the reader rather than ease them into its ideas. I can see how that approach might resonate with some people, especially if you enjoy experimental writing, but for me it made the reading experience more frustrating than engaging. Interesting in concept, but not one I connected with.
I neither enjoyed nor understood this book. I put it down halfway through with the intention of not finishing it. I ended up skim reading the second half only because it was a bookclub book and I had the guilts. As a stream of consciousness novel, there is no plot to follow. The main character is a particularly angry young woman, although from what I could see she is doesn’t have much to be angry about. The text is heavy with descriptions of bodily fluids, functions and orifices, sometimes surreal, sometimes real. There was so much of this content that it began to lose its impact or significance (although I’m still not sure what half of it was meant to signify anyway).
It has been suggested that this book is a feminist manifesto. Seriously? Well, it missed the mark with 4 out of 5 feminists in our book group. If this is feminism, it is a bleating form of feminism to which I do not subscribe. Complaining that female nudes in classical art are subjugated is just ridiculous. In the book, Munch’s painting “Puberty” is a particular problem for the protagonist. I’ve had a look at that painting and it does feel awkward. That’s how puberty feels. Munch got his message across perfectly if you ask me. Nudes of both genders have traditionally been the bedrock studies of artists in all metiers from the dawn of time, and that’s because the human form is to be celebrated.
You can probably tell I got really irritated with the character (and by extension the author) at this point. Apparently, Hval knew she risked incomprehensibility and controversy with this book. For me, controversy does not equal quality and what’s the point of a book no-one understands? I would not recommend this book to anyone.
Personally, I had mixed feelings with this one. I enjoyed some of the writing but not the narrative. I did not understand most of this book or pick up on any of the symbolism of which I am sure there was a lot. There was no real story line, instead it jumped about and always went off on some weird path that inevitably produced some sort of virginal orifice that would ooze out some form of black substance or excrement would be smeared somewhere. The location is the same as the narrative, distorted, overly exposed or pixelated and never fully developed. The only thing that did surprise me was that labia was only mentioned once! I did not enjoy this read.
I found Girls Against God a very difficult novel to get through. Despite pushing myself to finish it, the experience never became any easier or more engaging as I went along. Several times I came close to giving up altogether. I struggled to connect with the narrative, the characters, or the ideas in a meaningful way. The book’s tone felt intensely angry throughout, which, rather than drawing me in, made it hard to stay invested. While I can see that Jenny Hval is aiming for something bold and confrontational, it simply didn’t work for me. In the end, I didn’t enjoy the novel at all and found it more draining than rewarding.
Published in Norwegian in 2018
Translated into English by Marjam Idriss in 2020
Verso
240 pages
READ FOR NZ BOOK AWARDS
Set in the 1940s Taranaki, The Last Living Cannibal is narrated by an old man, Koko, from both the present and afterlife. It examines muru or the restoration of balance within an iwi or community, and is put to the test when a group arrive at Koko’s tangi to claim both the body and a grandchild.
We came from a long tradition of warriors. Righteous and covetous … Back in my day we had a clear enemy. Someone we could point to. Swing the thick end of a taiaha at. No-one nowhere in this country had warred as we warred against the Queen and her soldiers.
RACHEL:
In The Last Living Cannibal Ngarewa (Ngāti Ruanui, Ngā Rauru, Ngāruahine) investigates muru, a process of restorative justice undertaken traditionally on a Marae. The book informs us that “muru is not revenge. Muru is about balance. You put your hands on one of theirs and they had every right to take from you and yours whatever they meant to take, short of a life.”
Via lengthy family conversations, interactions and complex dynamics it examines topics of incarceration, trauma and survival by exploring how people carry inherited pain. The characters have lived through Parihaka, land wars, wrongful imprisonment and family trauma and it stays with them even into the afterlife.
Ngarewa builds a world that draws on both myth and history, grounding it in a distinct sense of place. Descriptions of the natural environment reinforce the NZ setting. The writing is empathic as it confronts the brutalities of history and the choices that keep repeating through generations. It was an emotional and educational read.
Published 2025
Moa Press
290 pages
READ FOR NZ BOOK AWARDS
Set during a cold Wellington winter, Before The Winter Ends explores the immigrant experience via Omar, a teen whose grades are slipping and is losing connection with his best friend, and his mother who recalls her life two decades earlier in Mogadishu, trying to build a life amidst political conflict.
His mother didn’t think he looked good at all. She thought the afro was too outdated – that it drew too much attention to them whenever they went out. It was problematic, Omar thought, especially since his hair was just naturally like this. He didn’t style it or anything … Omar had to stop himself asking why she admired his father’s afro in the blurry photo she kept in the corner of her mirror.
RACHEL:
The main character in this novel is Omar, a young man who is stuck between worlds in identity, appearance and language. He never feels completely at ease as he studies at university, cares for his struggling mother and relies heavily on his friend Nick. After familiarising ourselves with Omar and his struggles to fit in in Wellington, the novel then heads back to the ‘90s to understand his mother’s young adulthood set in the midst of conflict. The final chapters return to the present where each character tries to find redemption and hope after some tough life choices.
There is a lot grief, for people lost and experiences not realised. As a Somali New Zealander, Mohamed writes with sensitivity about how displacement and the immigrant experience affect parent-child relationships, regrets, traditions and faith, and details how important language and communication are. This was a emotional read and I really felt for all the characters.
The locations featured, Wellington, Cairo and Mogadishu, mimic Mohamed’s own travels, and it’s clear she is intimate with all three cities. I felt there was a strong sense of place in the descriptions of Wellington with its well-known neighbourhoods and atmosphere at the centre of the storytelling.
Published 2025
Tender Press
288 pages
READ FOR BOOKCLUB
Chosen by Bridget
Physics professor Jason Dessen is abducted into an alternate version of his own life and must find his way back to his own reality. Sci-fi thriller that explores choices, paths not taken, and how far we’ll go to claim the lives we dream of.
We all live day to day completely oblivious to the fact that we’re a part of a much larger and stranger reality than we can possibly imagine.
BRIDGET:
● Dark Matter is a fast-paced sci-fi thriller and love story that pulled me in from the first page. Crouch explores themes of love, trust, and bravery, illustrating how simple everyday choices can radically alter our life paths. I was thoroughly entertained throughout. While the technical nuances of the multiverse occasionally felt a bit dense, and the sheer number of “Jasons” was overwhelming at times, I recognise how vital those elements were to the narrative. The characters are exceptionally well-developed, even the alternate versions of Jason, whose darker experiences made them more ruthlessly determined. This novel made me reflect on my own “what ifs.” Overall, I loved it and highly recommend it to anyone seeking an action-packed read with some mind-bending twists. The ending was spot on.
TESSA:
● I had mixed feelings about Dark Matter. Because I do not usually read much of this genre, I sometimes found it difficult to fully connect with the story. However, I appreciated the way the novel explores ideas such as parallel universes, identity, and the consequences of the choices we make in life. One of the most interesting parts of the book is the idea of “what if?”— what if a single decision had led your life in a completely different direction? This concept made the story thought-provoking and gave it emotional depth.
However, some parts of the book were a bit confusing, especially when the story began dealing with multiple versions of the same character. At times, it became difficult to keep track of what was happening. Toward the end, the story also felt a little too far-fetched for my liking, which caused me to lose some interest in it. Overall, Dark Matter is an imaginative and engaging novel that explores big ideas about identity, choices, and the many possibilities our lives could take. While I did not enjoy every part of it, I still found it an interesting and fast-moving story that fans of science fiction would likely enjoy.
RACHEL:
● Dark Matter is an action-packed sci-fi novel with thought provoking ideas about existence, humanity and consequences. It shows, via a whirlwind trip around the multiverse, how every decision we makes impacts not only our own lives but those of everyone around us. While these philosophical ideas are compelling and even addictive, I found that character development came secondary. The cast functions more as vessels for ideas and transport for plot rather than fully developed characters whom I could care for. This focus on plot created a sense of overt sentimentality in the characters’ interactions, and this was particularly evident in the ending. But the vivid, cinematic scene setting and the relentless twists and turns were enough to keep me gripped and I enjoyed the fast, immersive experience of the book.
SALLY
● I loved this book. Straight out the gate I loved the pace of the writing and the concept of the plot. The prose is snappy and conversational. More than that though, I loved the questions the book raised about the choices we make in our lives, the reasons we make them and then the consequences of those choices. I am usually averse to sci-fi novels, but I think this book appealed because it is mostly set in our world but with visitations from and into a proposed “multiverse”. It took me a double read just before the halfway mark to get my head around the quantum physics which explains the potential for a multiverse but having grasped the general premise, it was back on board for the white-knuckle ride through the second half of the book. I can totally see why they have dramatised it for TV.
Ultimately, I felt this book was about love and ambition. It was about the character Jason Dessen’s journey to regain his wife and child and the realisation that home can be anywhere your loved ones are. I loved that Jason and Danielle, regardless of which version of the universe they were in, recognised that they were soulmates and that Danielle was prepared to take risks on the back of that gut feeling, even if she did not fully understand the world around her. It is also about ambition and how you define success. There were times I was genuinely chilled at the descriptions of the infinite worlds which could exist and the folly of trying to find the perfect one. It made me think of Robert Frost’s poem, The Road Not Taken. I will definitely be reading more of Blake Crouch.
Published 2016
Ballantine Books
342 pages
READ FOR BOOKCLUB
Chosen by Sally
Brodie Moncur is a young Scottish piano tuner who moves to Paris for a job and to escape his tyrannical father. There, a fateful encounter with a famous pianist changes his future and sparks an obsessive love affair with a beautiful Russian soprano. Moving between Paris, St Petersburg and Edinburgh in the early 20th century, Brodie’s love and its dangerous consequences pursue him around Europe and beyond.
“Complications. Oh, yes.’ The doctor reflected and then said, ‘I always think a life without complications isn’t really a life, you know. In life things go wrong, nothing stays the same and there’s nothing you can do about it. Friends betray you, family is a nightmare, lovers are fickle. This is the norm, no?’
SALLY:
● This was my choice for book group, having enjoyed some of Boyd’s previous work and wishing to introduce this Scottish author to my book group friends.
The book is in the style of others that I have read of his, in that it follows the life of an everyman character throughout whichever period of history and setting Boyd has chosen. He is meticulously researched and drills down into the minutiae of his characters lives as well accurate historical fact. He frequently blends real life characters into the plot with his fictional characters. Boyd himself has written “It’s the haphazard, rollercoaster of a life that is the key in the whole-life novel rather than a particular plot, theme or central relationship. Everything is grist to the mill for such novels, and this is what distinguishes the type.”
The story of Brodie Moncur’s life and undimmed love for Lika flows from Scotland to Paris, St Petersburg, Trieste and finally the South Pacific. Whilst I could be persuaded by Brodie’s emotion for Lika, I was never fully convinced of her’s for him, and I had a mild unease throughout the book that she was not quite what she seemed. Considering that, I found the ending slightly far-fetched.
Of all the Boyd novels I have read, this one seemed to be the bleakest. Possibly because of the number of betrayals Brodie suffers, possibly because the Scottish settings and characters are so mean (and I say this as a Scot). Happily, this has not put my book club friends off and one at least has read another Boyd subsequently. Mission accomplished!
JODIE:
● Love Is Blind starts strongly, with an original premise and some genuinely interesting detail about piano tuning, which I enjoyed. The early chapters drew me in and promised a rich, atmospheric historical novel.
However, the second half felt drawn out, repetitive, and slow. The drama often tipped into melodrama, without enough emotional depth to support it. Considering the book’s settings – Edinburgh, Paris, the French Riviera – I found the scenes surprisingly underdeveloped. I never gained a strong sense of place, which felt like a missed opportunity. I also struggled to believe in the characters, who seemed thinly drawn. As a result, the ending was anticlimactic rather than moving.
Overall, it’s a good storyline with an intriguing musical angle, but for me the execution fell short of its potential.
TESSA:
● After finishing Love Is Blind by William Boyd, I was left with mixed feelings. On one hand I really enjoyed the setting. Boyd brings to life the world of music halls, touring virtuosi and piano tuning with rich, convincing detail. The precarious livelihoods of musicians, the craft of tuning itself, all of it feels immersive and authentic. The historical backdrop is beautifully realised, and it’s clear how much care has gone into recreating this musical world.
But for me, I found the main characters difficult to warm to and struggled to invest in their relationship. Brodie often feels more like an observer than a fully realised emotional presence, and Lika remains frustratingly elusive. Overall, it felt muted and somewhat disappointing and the ending struck me as unsatisfying.
RACHEL:
● First of all, I think the cover and title do this book a disservice. It presents as a straightforward romance and, yes, while a love story does sit at its centre, Love Is Blind is more than that. It’s historical fiction, set in Scotland, France, Russia and other European outposts, and is the life story of an ordinary man (as ordinary as a piano tuner who engages in gun-toting duels can be). If you like music and European history, this may appeal to you.
Personally, I had mixed feelings. In hindsight, I appreciated the full life story, but while reading I did not because I kept trying to assign meaning to everything, wondering what purpose each event served. As Sally pointed out at bookclub, some things did not have a higher purpose, they were included simply because these things happen in real life. I suspect I might have enjoyed it more if I had a better understanding of the book from the outset. Ultimately I found it slow to start, some characters frustrating, and the ending a bit ridiculous. Though I did enjoy some of the mid-book action-packed scenes. Another bugbear was the presentation of women, their descriptions, thoughts and actions. To me it was apparent they were written by a man and I found myself eye-rolling a bit.
BRIDGET
● William Boyd proves himself a remarkably skillful wordsmith in this life genre, where obsession, betrayal, and revenge drive the narrative forward. At the centre of this book is Brodie, a man who finds himself betrayed by his employer and the woman he loves. Brodie is a pleasant enough character but I found I him, at times, weak and I really wanted him to make better decisions. I felt Lika, Brodie’s love interest, could have been more fully developed. Her elusiveness creates a sense that she is never entirely present, always holding something back. Perhaps that intentional distance is essential to her character, but it still left me wanting a deeper connection to her.
I was disappointed with the conclusion, it felt a little undercooked and I found myself wishing for something with a bit more of a punch to it. Love is Blind was an easy read if not a little boring. I would recommend it to anyone interested in the workings of pianos.
Published 2018
Alfred A. Knopf
384 pages
In 2026 we are focused on the intersection of time, or what do we owe the past, and what do we owe the future? We have a new and evolving bookclub that is considerate of the past members and reading history but also focused on how the future will shape up with new personalities and new energy.
This outlook is a unifying lens for the list of books we have chosen because every one of these novels is, in some way, negotiating responsibility across time. Not nostalgia or progress for its own sake, but the uneasy space in between when both the past is having influence but the future is forcing its own considerations on us as readers.
We have books steeped in memory and legacy, others that examine how deeply the past imprints itself on the physical self. What happens when the past is distorted? How does trauma and colonial inheritance influence our current day decisions? What do we carry forward? What do we lay down? Which inheritances are burdens and which are gifts? What happens when future paths are infinite and determined by the paths we abandoned?
In 2026, we read across time. And we invite you to join us on the journey. Here’s our reading list:
Love Is Blind – William Boyd
Dark Matter – Blake Crouch
Girls Against God – Jenny Hval
All Our Yesterdays – Natalia Ginzberg
1985 – Dominic Hoey
What We Can Know – Ian McEwan
Soviet Milk – Nora Ikstena
The Frozen River – Ariel Lawhon
Intermezzo – Sally Rooney
Daughters Of The Deer – Danielle Daniel
When we talk about the world being global, it’s easy to imagine overwhelming vastness and perhaps feel a little lost in it. When in fact the world is not stretching away from us, it’s coming to us. Wherever we are, we are surrounded by language, food, music, beliefs and histories that originate from beyond our immediate location. We don’t have to travel to experience cultural exchange, instead it happens in our schools, workplaces and neighbourhoods, offering everyday opportunities to stretch our thinking and considerations.
Our senses impose on us a particular kind of knowledge of the world. And they are limited, aren’t they? But what if the world around us is entirely different than our imperfect senses try to convince us?
The Empusium by Olga Tokarczuk
This closeness brings challenges as well as rewards. International events in 2025 have shown us that political decisions, environmental shifts and social movements are not bound by borders. No place is truly insulated from what happens elsewhere. But, alongside the uncertainty this can bring is the possibility of deeper understanding. Exposure, good and bad, to different cultures and ideas can make us more curious and capable of seeing the world from perspectives other than our own.
This is why reading novels that reflect the global landscape matters. Fiction allows us to experience difference without fear, to sit inside another life and recognise both its specificity and humanity.
One man hurried his daughter across the street to avoid us, and when she said that we looked quite normal he muttered, “They’re not like you and me.”
The Book of Guilt by Catherine Chidgey
That thinking shaped our decision to read “around the world” in 2025, our 19th year of bookclub. It’s humbling to reflect on how much has changed since 2007, not just around the world but in our reading group as a reflection of the wider world. Back then, our choices were narrow. We read mostly men, and very little translated or cultural fiction.
By comparison in 2025 every book took us somewhere different. Germany, Poland, Italy, Antarctica, Britain, Palestine, Ukraine, America, Ireland and Morocco. Each author was a compelling guide to their country and culture and provided clear messages on societal pasts and potential futures.
They’d drive at full speed on the road to Azemmour, or fall asleep in the sun high above Casablanca, among the laundry and the giant satellite dishes. They’d wake up to the song of the muezzin summoning the faithful for evening prayer, and all the white roofs would already be orange from the setting sun.
As Rich As The King by Abigail Assor
We also welcomed three new book club members this year. Tessa, Sally and Bridget have brought their own worldly experiences to discussions. Thank you, and welcome!
We ended the year at Brick Eatery, talking through our best of the best. With a broader reading list and a more varied membership there was less consensus than in years past, which felt refreshing. Though, Wild Dark Shore did take the unofficial award for most atmospheric setting, and there were a couple of clear overall favourites. Most importantly, our differences and commonalities prompted lively discussions about what was memorable, what has stayed with us and how our feelings have evolved about some of the titles.
It’s what you all do, in the free world. You waste your freedom and your clear skies on things that don’t matter, like politeness and the perfect lawn. That’s why I can’t go back. I lived in a stupor and now, it’s like, all the colors are saturated. Like someone took electrodes to my eye rods and jolted them. You become like a lizard, where there’s no past or future, where everything’s trained on the present.
Endling by Maria Reva
Here’s some of our thoughts:
Best Cover:
Bridget: Endling
Jodie: The Book of Guilt
Rachel: The Book of Guilt
Sally: Endling
Tessa: Before The Queen Falls Asleep
Best Character:
Bridget: Vincent from The Book Of Guilt
Jodie: Alessandra from Her Side Of The Story
Rachel: Alessandra from Her Side Of The Story
Sally: Vincent from The Book Of Guilt
Tessa: Mother Night from The Book Of Guilt
Favourite Animal:
Bridget: Lefty the snail in Endling
Jodie: Cynthia the dog in The Book Of Guilt
Rachel: The albatross in Wild Dark Shore
Sally: The ponies in The Book Of Guilt
Tessa: Cynthia the dog in The Book Of Guilt
Best ending:
Bridget: As Rich As The King
Jodie: Her Side Of The Story
Rachel: Her Side Of The Story
Sally: The Book Of Guilt
Tessa: The Empusium
Runner Up Best Book:
Bridget: Hum by Helen Phillips
Jodie: Her Side Of The Story by Alba de Cespedes
Rachel: The Book Of Guilt by Catherine Chidgey
Sally: The Empusium by Olga Tokarczuk
Tessa: The Book Of Guilt by Catherine Chidgey
Book Of The Year:
Bridget: The Book Of Guilt by Catherine Chidgey
Jodie: The Book Of Guilt by Catherine Chidgey
Rachel: Endling by Maria Reva
Sally: The Book Of Guilt by Catherine Chidgey
Tessa: Endling by Maria Reva
I could reproach her for having subjected me to that climate of perpetual exaltation which, above all, made me completely devoted to the myth of the Great Love and thus unintentionally led to the painful situation I find myself in today.
Her Side Of The Story by Alba de Cespedes
Pictured: Brick Eatery in Monaco, Nelson
Recent Comments