READ FOR BOOKCLUB
Chosen by Rachel
Set toward the end of World War II in 1944, on an island off the coast of Italy, Joseph Heller’s Catch 22 is a satirical anti-war novel. It features extensive use of black humour, a non-linear structure, surrealism and an anti-hero protagonist who struggles to deal with the insanity of war. He decides that the only sane response to it is not to participate in it.
That anti-hero is American army pilot John Yossarian, who is aghast at his commander who keeps raising the number of missions men must complete before being rotated out. He spends most of his time trying to get out of active flight duty by asking to be declared insane. However, the mysterious Catch-22 states that only an insane man would fly this dangerous missions so asking to be grounded proves he is sane. The circular reasoning of this “catch” is the central metaphor for the absurdity of war and the military bureaucracy.
The book and its many characters and plot lines drive home the author’s point that institutions such as the military, big business, government, and religion are corrupt and individuals must find their own responses to this corruption. Heller’s questioning of these institutions, and of war in general, reflect the social protests and anti-war movements of the late 1960s.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them. With Major Major it had been all three. Even among men lacking all distinction he inevitably stood out as a man lacking more distinction than all the rest, and people who met him were always impressed by how unimpressive he was.
“This is one of those hilarious but desperately sad books that makes you laugh but want to cry at the same time. The story is strange and convoluted and it drags you into the chaos, no matter how many times you’ve re-read it. Additionally, there’s a cast of characters who range from anti-heroes, to well-crafted protagonists to cliched war-story clowns, reminding us how real but how ridiculous war is. You cannot help but be moved and entertained with this book. One of my all time favourites.” – Rachel
—–
Published 1961
Simon & Schuster
543 pages
READ FOR BOOKCLUB
Chosen by Sophia
Troubled teen and tomboy Frankie Addams becomes obsessed with her brother’s wedding plans as she seeks to become a member of something important.
Frankie Addams is an awkward twelve year old out of school for the summer. She lives with her widowed father and a housekeeper named Berenice. Her father is a jeweller and often not home. As a result, Frankie is closer to Berenice and often looking for belonging. What’s more she is tall, has cropped hair, and is a tomboy, so is no longer included in the group of neighbourhood girls. She struggles with her identity and self-esteem.
Frankie reads about the events of World War II and imagines it as an adventure, of being part of something that is easily defined. When her brother Jarvis announces his upcoming wedding, Frankie is elated. Through a combination of wishful thinking and youthful naiveté, she becomes convinced that she will go with her brother and his bride on their honeymoon, and live with them wherever they go afterward. Believing that she has solved the problem of not belonging anywhere, she begins planning for her new life.
Parts of The Member of the Wedding are autobiographical. McCullers lived in a small home town, had a jeweller father and African-American servants. Frankie’s feelings of awkwardness are drawn from McCullers who said she felt like a gangly misfit and whose tomboyish ways made it difficult to fit in with boys or girls her age.
She stood in the corner of the bride’s room, wanting to say: I love the two of you so much and you are the we of me. Please take me with you from the wedding, for we belong to be together.
❖ “There is a kind of awkwardness to this book which makes it uncomfortable but distinctive. Frankie IS the story and she is a perfect character. She embodies the need to belong and I’m sure everyone could relate to her because of this. Exceptionally well written and enjoyable.” – Rachel
—–
Published 1946
Houghton Mifflin Publishing
176 pages
READ FOR BOOKCLUB
Chosen by Jo
The Little Stranger is a mixed genre story set in a dilapidated mansion in Warwickshire, England in the 1940s. It features a country doctor who calls on an old family of declining fortunes who own the old estate that is crumbling around them.Though attending in a professional manner at first, the doctor becomes entwined in the family’s plight and the ghoulish goings on. The historical/gothic novel also delves into many societal interactions of the time: class systems, repression, gender roles and the British way of life.
It was simply that, in admiring the house, I wanted to possess a piece of it — or rather, as if the admiration itself, which I suspected a more ordinary child would not have felt, entitled me to it.
❖ “A very cleverly written ghost story … but is it a ghost story? Nothing is as it seems and with the tension gradually building between the two main characters and the strange happenings at the mansion, you are in for a stimulating read. One of my favourites, and I loved the re-read.” – Jo
❖ “The re-read is even more riveting than the first and I thought I might pick up a little more about the goings-on, but alas. In saying that, I love how everything is not completely spelled out. The story is engrossing, melding historical fiction and supernatural genres. The characters are troubled but charismatic and offer both sides of the argument, with the mysterious goings on first considered by the insular family and then the doctor’s scientific mind. It really is a wonderful read.” – Rachel
—–
Published 2009
Virago
510 pages
READ FOR BOOKCLUB
Chosen by Suzy
The Catcher in the Rye tells the story of two days in the life of Holden Caulfield, a 16 year old who, days before his expulsion, leaves school to mill about in New York City.
Published in 1951, the book created a character the likes of which was not really seen in this time period and who instantly became a hit with teenagers and young adults for his carefree and rebellious nature.
An underachiever, Holden drops out of school three times and is about to flunk school for the fourth time. He ends up getting so annoyed with his school and his school mates that he leaves in the middle of the night on the next train home to New York City. Arriving a few days earlier than his parents expect him, he hangs out in the city to delay the inevitable confrontation with his parents.
In a period of time that seems to last days, Holden mingles with all sorts of people and glides through all sorts of interesting encounters some of which were slightly taboo in 1951. His brief period out in the world on his own represents many of the emotions and considerations associated with growing up and moving out of adolescence and into manhood such as considering the future, guilt about family and fear of failure.
I keep picturing an these little kids playing some game in this big field of rye and all. Thousands of little kids, and nobody’s around-nobody big, I mean-except me. And I’m standing on the edge of some crazy cliff. What I have to do, I have to eaten everybody if they start to go over the cliff I mean if they’re running and they don’ I look where they’re going I have to come out from somewhere and catch them. That’s all I’d do all day. I’d be the catcher in the rye and all. I know it’s crazy, but that’s the only thing I’d really like to be. I know it’s crazy.
❖ “This is my all-time favourite book, I rarely re-read but I have read this every 2-3 years since high school. Holden’s observations about people, his surroundings, life in general are perfect. He is literature’s best slacker & cynic – I heart you Holden.” – Suzy
❖ “A book which is ideal for reading and reading again. Holden is uber cool and easy to connect with, despite, or because of, his rebellious nature. It’s easy for any person on the cusp of adulthood to see a part of themselves reflected in Holden, especially that desire to just run away from all the responsibility. Love him. Love his world.” – Rachel
—–
Published 1951
Little, Brown & Co
210 pages
READ FOR BOOKCLUB
Chosen by Nicole
Perfume is a a cross-genre novel about Jen-Baptiste Grenouille, a Frenchman born into eighteenth-century France. Abandoned by his mother, he has a superior sense of smell and no personal odour of his own. In order to both create a scent for himself and create the prefect scent, he turns into a cold and calculating murderer. He is motivated in particular by one young woman whose scent he desires to possess. Jean-Baptiste becomes an apprentice and then a master perfumer in order to fulfill his desires.
This scent had a freshness, but not the freshness of limes or pomegranates, not the freshness of myrrh or cinnamon bark or curly mint or birch or camphor or pine needles, not that of a May rain or a frosty wind or of well water… and at the same time it had warmth, but not as bergamot, cypress, or musk has, or jasmine or daffodils, not as rosewood has or iris… This scent was a blend of both, of evanescence and substance, not a blend, but a unity, although slight and frail as well, and yet solid and sustaining, like a piece of thin, shimmering silk… and yet again not like silk, but like pastry soaked in honey-sweet milk – and try as he would he couldn’t fit those two together: milk and silk! This scent was inconceivable, indescribable, could not be categorised in any way – it really ought not to exist at all. And yet there it was as plain and splendid as day.
The beauty and skill of perfumery is portrayed in such an intoxicating and romantic manner it is a joy to learn about the creation of each and every scent and infact often side tracked us readers from remembering Jean-Baptiste is a murderer and a psychopath.
It sounds gruesome but the story is so well developed we kind of fell into it without realising how obscene it actually was. When you find yourself not only accepting the deeds of a psychopath but seeing the beauty in their skill, you know the book is well written!
Described by the bookclubbers as “totally riveting”, “obscene”, “beautiful” and “gruesome”. Often all at once!
—–
Published 1985
Hamish Hamilton (UK)
263 pages
READ FOR BOOKCLUB
Chosen by Rachel
This seemingly simple story of a Japanese man whose cat runs away is anything but.
❖ “I couldn’t wait to re-read and share this, my #1 favourite book of all time. I was nervous too, knowing how much of an emotional journey this is, worried the others would not love it as much as I did. But after page one I had settled into it, like a comfy old chair and I once again got lost in Murakami’s genius.
“The dopplegangers, which I did not realise on on my first read, were especially enjoyable to analyse on my second reading. I think this is a book which would keep on giving on subsequent readings as there is so much depth invested into every character and every scene. I am already looking forward to the time when I read Wind-Up Bird for a third time.
“This is an indescribable masterpiece and one I would recommend to anyone and everyone. It may have seemingly limitless depth but its simplistic writing style makes it is accessible to everyone.
“During my second reading, and with a number of other Murakami books under my belt, I also appreciated the work of translator Jay Rubin further. To have translated this epic tome without losing the mystique nor simplicity, makes him the co-author.” – Rachel
You might think you made a new world or a new self, but your old self is always gonna be there, just below the surface, and if something happens, it’ll stick its head out and say ‘Hi.’ You don’t seem to realize that. You were made somewhere else.
❖ “This was the first book of Murikami’s that I’ve read. It was confusing and our bookclub analysis afterwards cleared up a lot of my questions. Murikami has a unique way of writing with characters having two selves and the existence of a parallel world. A complex story written in an easy to read way. Totally fabulous despite the heinous skinning description!” – Jo
Published in Japanese 1994
Translated into English by Jay Rubin 1997
Knopf
607 pages
What’s in a title? I mean, where did Hard-Boiled Wonderland & The End of the World come from? And how would we refer to dilemmas from which there is no escape because of a mutually conflicting condition if Joseph Heller had gone with his first title idea: Catch-11.
Yes, titles take time and are often best formulated once the story has been written and examined from all angles for a period of time.
So, for six years now, we have referred to ourselves solely, and factually, as “bookclub”. While there were occasional discussions about an official name, nothing eventuated; enough time seemed to have not passed. Now we have come to realise that the couple of descriptors we have come to use when we talk of ourselves must be incorporated into titles of some kind.
First there is free range. Free of boundaries and limitations. Free to roam with our ideas and opinions. And then there is the word coined by our husbands but embraced by us: nerdy. Perhaps it is time to incorporate both names. The Free Range Bookclub we will be officially. But amongst ourselves (and our husbands) we’ll always be nerdy bookclub.
🙂
Recently we welcomed a fifth member – we have never been so abundant! – and that is the lovely Nicole. Welcome!
As far as book choices go this year we have opted to each pick two of our favourites of all time, so we can share our true literary loves. Lots of re-reading for some, a luxury we don’t get often enough, which introduces a whole new level of understanding and conversation. Oh yes, what a schedule we’ve got lined up:
The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle – Haruki Murakami
Perfume – Patrick Suskind
The Catcher In The Rye – J D Salinger
The Little Stranger – Sarah Waters
The Member Of The Wedding – Carson McCullers
Catch-22 – Joseph Heller
Flowers In The Attic – Virginia Andrews
To Kill A Mockingbird – Harper Lee
The God Of Small Things – Arundhati Roy
What a year with Kiwi new releases lining the bookshelves and winning important accolades. To name just a few; Emily Perkin’s The Forrests, Paula Morris’ Rangatira, Charlotte Grimshaw’s Cool, C K Stead’s Risk and even a posthumous collection of stories by Janet Frame.
It’s no wonder then that Australian publisher Text Publishing has begun reviving lost New Zealand and Australian classics, much to the delight of literary readers Down Under. Classics we love and others we’ve never heard of are now easily accessible.
As we pondered out growing TBR piles, we headed to the Jester Cafe in the Tasman countryside to sit in the sun all day, eat organic delicacies, order refills and talk literature.
Our reading list in 2012 has provided us with much to agree upon. Some years our highlights and low-points are varied, but this year we managed to put together a list of books and poetry that were likeable and meaningful to us all. With the exception of one book, but we all agreed on the unlikeable nature of the story and the autobiographical protagonist too!
Book of the year:
Rachel: Of Mice & Men
Jo: The Bell
Suzy: The Parihaka Woman
Sophia: Slaughterhouse Five
Nicole: The Bell
Runner up:
Rachel: Slaughterhouse Five
Jo: Under The Net
Suzy: The Bell
Sophia: Under The Net
Nicole: Of Mice & Men
READ FOR BOOKCLUB
Chosen by Rachel
A 1937 novella which details the life of George and Lennie, two displaced migrants looking for ranch work in Southern California during a time of drought.
George is the central character. He’s described as small of stature, but a strong-willed man who is in charge and not afraid to speak his mind. He has a firm plan, to save enough money to set up a small stakeholding.
His off-sider Lennie is a large, strong man but is simple and does not understand his strength nor have much self control. He relies on George to look after him and lead him through life. He likes nothing more than to hear George talk of their dreams of owning land, in particular the part where Lennie gets to look after the rabbits.
The pair get work on a ranch and we meet a handful of characters who support the themes of loyalty and compassion, loneliness and ambitions, for they all hope for something more than they have. Yet being in close quarters without much to call your own and when times are hard can bring about unfortunate circumstances.
Of Mice & Men is widely considered a classic though it has been subjected to censorship for various reasons including vulgarity, treatment of women and the close friendship of the men. Bans have been in place off and on since 1937 right up until this century.
I ain’t got no people. I seen the guys that go around on the ranches alone. That ain’t no good. They don’t have no fun. After a long time they get mean. They get wantin’ to fight all the time. . . ‘Course Lennie’s a God damn nuisance most of the time, but you get used to goin’ around with a guy an’ you can’t get rid of him.
© “Of Mice and Men is a tribute to literature and to humanity. It understands the complexities of relationships in a simply told story. It has influenced pop culture and human nature so much that reading the book in this day and age feels like the story is already known. It must have been a shock and a delight to read it upon first publication. One of my favourite all time books. I have thought of this book a lot since I first read it and the joy of a re-read is nearly just as good.” – Rachel
—–
Published 1937
Covici Friede
187 pages
Recent Comments