READ FOR WOMEN’S PRIZE
In her final year of college, Jordan is drawn into the orbit of brilliant students Sam and Yash. What begins as friendship develops into a complicated relationship between the three, shaped by intellectual rivalry, attraction and secrets whose significance only becomes clear with time. Decades later, an unexpected encounter prompts Jordan to look back at those formative years and reconsider what really happened between them.
What I am saying, these decisions we make in youth are everything. You have no idea. Those feelings, they don’t revenir. Pas comme ça. And no one tells you.’ She points to the pages of Yash’s letter on the bed. ‘Do not put this love second. Marry him. Marry him and have your babies. It doesn’t matter what happens after that.’ I say I’m only twenty-three and she says, ‘Screw the calendar. What does a calendar know about love?
RACHEL
● Heart the Lover is a book of two parts. Initially we meet Jordan at College, where she becomes entangled with fellow students Sam and Yash and there are a lot of complicated feelings, followed by a lot of complicated actions in response to those feelings. The tone is angst-ridden, with emotional young adults throwing their heaving hearts about and despairing over everything left, right and centre. It was all a bit melodramatic for me, although I thought King constructed her characters well and revealed the story in a way that kept drawing me in. I also acknowledge she does a pretty good job of capturing just how intensely young people can feel everything. It’s just not something I’m particularly fond of reading about.
I enjoyed the second part more. Jordan is now in midlife, and a successful writer with a loving family, when someone from her past resurfaces and brings that earlier emotional upheaval back to the fore. This time, though, we have the level-headed lens of middle age through which to examine it. I found this part far more realistic, and the prose compelling enough that I genuinely wanted to know what had happened.
By the end, King ties up all the threads. Not in a neat romantic or happily-ever-after way, thankfully, but we do get answers to the accumulated questions and mysteries. I found some of the revelations unbelievable, which was disappointing, although at least they were consistent with the melodrama in the rest of the book.
Published 2025
Grove Press
256 pages
READ FOR BOOKCLUB
Chosen by Jodie
Published in 1952 and set against the rise of fascism and the Second World War in Italy, All Our Yesterdays explores how history unfolds through ordinary lives rather than extraordinary events. Natalia Ginzburg examines family, love, duty and the compromises people make as the world around them drastically changes.
He told her that up till that day she had lived like an insect. An insect that knows nothing beyond the leaf upon which it hangs.
Click the arrow to read each person’s full review
Natalia Ginzburg’s All Our Yesterdays is a novel that stayed with me long after I finished it. What I enjoyed most was her style of writing. It’s plain, direct, and completely free of unnecessary drama, yet it manages to convey so much emotion. I also loved her dry humour. Even during tragic or difficult moments, there is often a subtle comedic edge that feels very human and true to life.
Ginzburg’s writing is simple and understated, which is something I really appreciate. Rather than focusing on heroic events or larger-than-life characters, she writes about ordinary family life, relationships, and the small decisions that shape people’s lives. The story unfolds against the backdrop of wartime Italy, but the focus remains firmly on the everyday experiences of her characters.
Some readers may find her style too simple, but I think that’s where her strength lies. Beneath the straightforward language is an enormous amount of emotional depth. She captures loneliness, love, disappointment, and resilience with remarkable honesty. The emotions are never overstated, which somehow makes them even more powerful.
For me, All Our Yesterdays was a thoughtful and deeply moving novel that demonstrates how much can be said with seemingly simple prose.
As a fan of Ginzburg’s novellas I was keen to read one of her full length novels. All Our Yesterdays has the same rolling, off-hand, over-the-fence style narrative that feels like someone recounting gossip. In a novella it adds to the snappy, fragmentary style revelations that keep the pace and intrigue up. Initially, I wasn’t convinced it worked as well in a full length novel. I felt one step removed from the action, like I wasn’t in the midst of it observing everything first hand.
But as the war setting intensified and people’s lives became a series of hurried conversations exchanged on street corners, I began to appreciate how well suited this style was. Life, especially in wartime, changes in an instant and there is little time to ponder, dramatise and eulogise over individual events when your community is under siege. The more I read, the more the book and vast cast of characters grew on me and in the end I felt that All Our Yesterdays was an authentic portrayal of Italian war life. As Ginzburg lived through this time herself it’s no surprise the plot and characters seem so realistic. I particularly liked the last section where the pace heightens and all the hearsay comes to shocking fruition.
It took me a while, about halfway through, to start enjoying this one. Natalia Ginzburg’s literal style was initially quite hard to read, mostly because none of her characters actually speak. Instead, the book is written as if someone is telling the story in a gossipy way, a style I have never come across before! On reflection, though, it perfectly suits the feel of the novel. The story is set across several small Italian villages and towns, the exact kinds of places where everyone makes it their business to know what everyone else is doing.
The plot strolls along at a semi-slow pace, introducing the dynamics of the primary family and the family next door. Interestingly, neither family is given a surname; they clearly have them, but Ginzburg chooses not to use them. She also avoids using first names for certain characters, like Anna’s father, who is simply called “the old man,” or Anna’s daughter, who is referred to as “the little girl.” By omitting these names, I never actually formed a picture in my mind of what the characters looked like, which was a unique experience for me as a reader. Despite the slow pace, several life-changing events are delivered in an almost matter-of-fact way. These were the parts I had to re-read just to process the full impact of what was happening. Ultimately, Ginzburg’s vocabulary offers a deeply personal, human viewpoint of this historical era one in which she lived through.
While I enjoyed the book on its own, it truly came alive for me once I learned more about the author herself.
This classic war novel follows two families who live opposite each other in a small town. The cast of characters includes all the family members, their servants, their friends, village luminaries such as the police sergeant and the chemist, the local Marchesa, peasant farmers, refugee Jews and the village cripple. We even have an insight into the thoughts of a disillusioned young German soldier. In short, we see the situation through the eyes of every level of society and political persuasion. Despite many reviews leaning towards the youngest daughter, Anna, as the main protagonist, I didn’t feel there was a main protagonist but rather a whole tapestry of stories, each intertwining with the others and affecting them differently.
As the story progresses, we learn who amongst the characters can rise above the pressures, depravations and loss of war and who crumbles. Perhaps even more moving though, are the characters who neither rise nor crumble but just grind a way through the hell of the occupation and survive.
Ginzberg’s style was off-putting to me at first. She often uses very long sentences, lots of comma breaks and repetition within the same sentence. It’s not that these long sentences are hard to follow, the opposite. The word that came to mind for me was that she was prattling, almost gossiping. A lot of the text sounded to me as if it was being recited over the fence by one nosy neighbour to another. Once I had packaged it like that, it felt authentic in that it reflected the small-town relationships, mentalities and events that are the fibre of the whole novel. Because it was such a rapid-fire style, I did feel she lost the impact that one of the more serious events should have had on me as a reader.
This book would make a great film, and as an aside, my copy of the novel has a fabulous photo on the front by the great American photographer Ruth Orkin. It will be a serious runner for our “Book Cover the Year” award. Titled “Jinx and Justin – Florence 1951”, do yourself a favour and go down a rabbit hole looking up both Orkin and Jinx (real name Ninalee Craig).
I absolutely loved All Our Yesterdays and could not put it down. The novel follows the lives of two interconnected families as they navigate love, loss, family tensions, and the gradual intrusion of history into their everyday lives. While the book is undoubtedly shaped by war, fascism, politics, and the major historical events of the period, for me it’s true strength lies in its intimate portrayal of ordinary people.
Ginzburg writes with remarkable sensitivity, capturing the small moments and relationships that define her characters just as much as the larger events unfolding around them. The novel feels deeply human, showing how history is experienced not through headlines and military campaigns, but through families, friendships, marriages, and personal struggles.
The second half of the novel contains some incredibly heartbreaking events as the realities of war arrive on the characters’ doorstep. These moments are handled with emotional honesty and restraint, making them all the more powerful. In particular, Anna emerges as a memorable protagonist. Faced with profound tragedy and disappointment, she demonstrates quiet strength and resilience, adapting to circumstances beyond her control.
What stayed with me most was the way experiences of war do not simply end when peace arrives; they become woven into the characters’ identities and relationships, influencing the lives they build afterwards.
‘And they laughed a little and were friendly together, the three of them, Anna,
Emanuele and Giustino; and they were pleased to be together, the three of them, thinking of the dead, and of the long war and the sorrow and noise and confusion, and of the long difficult life which they saw in front of them now, full of all the things they did not know how to do’.
By the final page, I felt as though I had lived alongside these families and witnessed a significant chapter of their lives. A beautifully written novel which I highly recommend and give a 10 out of 10.
First published in 1952 in Italian
Translated in 1956 by Angus Davidson
Giulio Einaudi Editore
300 pages
RACHEL:
● The Ockham New Zealand Book Awards shortlist was a mixed bag for me this year. The shortlist ranges from the diva of NZ fiction Catherine Chidgey to debut novelists, a poet and memoirist, and a visual artist. The subject matter is equally diverse: an alternative reality set in Britian in 1979, a Kiwi family navigating love and loss, nine linked stories about successful women from NZ and abroad, to a book about, well, the author himself.
Before getting to the four that did make the shortlist, I want to acknowledge a few that didn’t. 1985 by Dominic Hoey is a fabulous read and I’m unsure why it missed out. It is nostalgic, very Kiwi in its vernacular, highlights the plight of the under privileged, and is uniquely warm and wholesome.
I also really enjoyed The Last Living Cannibal, which explores Māori and societal history, and Before The Winter Ends with its focus on the immigrant experience in New Zealand. All three felt distinctly rooted in Aotearoa. And, to be honest, I struggle to understand how a book about its own author, a privileged white artist who is frequently disparaging about others especially women, was considered to have a more compelling or important story to tell than any of the aforementioned.
Of the four that were shortlisted, my clear favourite is The Book of Guilt. Chidgey is a master of pace, reveals and lurking sinister undertones. She respects her readers’ intelligence and paints a thought-provoking picture of society’s past and possible future. If the award is for the best-written novel, I can’t see how anything but this could win. The issue I can see is that The Book of Guilt isn’t set in New Zealand and isn’t about Kiwis or our history and I can see it being pipped at the post that feels more representative of us.
If this is the case I’d be happy to see either All Her Lives or Hoods Landing recognised. Both are distinctly Kiwi and impressive debuts.
READ FOR BOOKCLUB
Chosen by Tessa
Set in 1985 Auckland, this novel follows an 11 year old boy named Obi who is on the cusp of teenagehood but has a maturity shaped by poverty, dysfunctional family dynamics, (dis)organised crime and violence. His dad’s delusional, his mum’s sick, the Rainbow Warrior just exploded, and Obi is looking for a way to make quick money. An electric novel about life in a multi-cultural, counter-cultural part of Auckland pre-gentrification.
The smell of graffiti and sunburn, empty stomachs and pockets stuffed with other people’s treasure. Sewage when it rained, of fear, of knowing that reality hates its job, and that being a child is like being stupid on acid.
Click the arrow to read each person’s full review
I chose 1985 for our April book club as I wanted to include a New Zealand author, and the novel’s nomination for the Dublin Literary Awards caught my attention. I also hadn’t come across Dominic Hoey before, and the synopsis on the back cover intrigued me. I wasn’t disappointed—in fact, I really loved this book. For me, it carried a strong sense of nostalgia. Having grown up in Auckland, I found the setting and time period incredibly familiar, which made the story feel even more vivid and personal.
Hoey’s writing style is highly descriptive, and the short, fast-paced chapters made it an engaging and easy read. Each chapter left me wanting to continue, creating a strong sense of momentum throughout the book.
One of the novel’s strengths lies in its characters. They are deeply flawed—particularly the adults—but Hoey writes them with empathy and, at times, a surprising amount of warmth. Obi’s father, for example, is largely unreliable and constantly scheming for ways to make money without working. Yet he is not without redeeming qualities. Moments like when he teaches Obi to cook add depth to his character and show a different side to their relationship. These small glimpses of care make the characters feel real rather than one-dimensional. Despite the difficult circumstances depicted throughout the novel, I feel it remains inherently hopeful. It strikes a compelling balance between social commentary and a coming-of-age story, exploring hardship while still allowing space for growth, connection, and resilience.
That said, this isn’t a book I would recommend to everyone. The frequent use of strong language is a defining feature of the narrative voice and may not appeal to all readers. However, for those who don’t mind this, it adds authenticity to the story and its setting.
Overall, I found 1985 to be a compelling and evocative novel that blends gritty realism with moments of tenderness. It’s a powerful portrayal of place, family, and growing up, and one that resonated with me long after I finished.
There’s a real satisfaction in reading a novel deeply rooted in New Zealand history, society and culture. The settings, language and behavioural idiosyncrasies in this book offered a large dose of nostalgic sentiment. (I too played Spaceys in the fish & chip shop in 1985!) Even the darkly funny yet deeply empathetic narrative voice felt unmistakably Kiwi.
Within that cocoon of familiarity is a cast of characters balanced between strengths, flaws and misguided morals. I bonded quickly with Obi, his best mate Al and his sister Summer as well as some of the minor characters. I was conflicted about the parents as it felt like Hoey wanted us to forgive them too easily, despite the father’s poor role modelling and the mother’s indifference. But the fact I am spending so much time dissecting them means there has clearly been a lot of thought in how they were developed.
There is a simple plot, of Obi trying to save the family home via Spacey competitions and treasure maps, but ultimately this is a character study, and a very good one at that. I think 1985 should have been shortlisted for the NZ Book Awards.
What a great read! Hoey does a fantastic job of bringing a wide range of characters to life in this book. They all sit comfortably within the narrative, and even though some only make brief appearances, you get a real sense of who they are. They all share one thing in common: a desire to improve their lives.
The scale of these ambitions is wide-ranging, from petty theft and shifts at the bacon factory to dreams of directing movies or becoming the best Space Invaders player in town. Every character is looking for something more than what they currently have.
While there isn’t a traditional “action” plot, the story beautifully captures an eleven-year-old boy at the age of exploration and self-discovery. Seeing the world through his eyes gives the story a layer of innocence that slowly peels away. It’s a poignant journey as he eventually realises his father isn’t quite the hero he imagined him to be.
Hoey’s writing style is a total pleasure to read, I absolutely loved this book.
1985 is a heart-warming, tragi-comic biography in the same vein as Taika Waititi’s film Boy.
The central character Obi is navigating a childhood in poverty, with a father who is a petty criminal, frustrated poet and recidivist alcoholic. His mother’s life has been blighted by chronic illness (secondary to drug use) and despite a university education, she has seriously failed to achieve her potential. Despite their issues, both parents genuinely worship each other and love Obi and his sister Summer. It was painful to read about the constant lack of good food, the crime and gang violence all around them, the constant mold and dampness in their home, the pain of disappointment when Obi’s father disappoints him repeatedly. I also felt incredible tension related to Summer who is clearly disillusioned with her family but is seeking solace down all the wrong avenues.
One of the main themes in this book is having a dream or being a dreamer. For some it is a superpower and for others it is their downfall. Obi’s dream is to find buried treasure and save the family from losing their home.
I genuinely loved every character in this book. Despite their flaws, I forgave them because they each show a vulnerable side and are principled in their own misguided ways. Stand out for me is Al, Obi’s Samoan friend who is full of wise-cracks and cheek despite having been abandoned by both his parents to the care of an aunty and a large, extended family of cousins. The warmth and care that comes from within that home for both Al and Obi gave me warm fuzzies. I love that Al has the seemingly impossible dream of becoming a filmmaker.
This is a seriously New Zealand read, anchored as it is in Grey Lynn, Auckland in 1985. It references key political events in New Zealand such as the Springboks Tour, the Dawn Raids and the sinking of the Rainbow Warrier.
The theme of children trying to navigate the chaos and neglect inflicted on them by their carers is not a new one and is handled with insight and poignancy. I was filled with a sense of dread when the boys were stranded on the far side of the city late at night and yet they are taken in by some other wonderful characters. This is ultimately a hopeful book about the warmth of communities and the kindness of strangers, tempered by the gritty reality of crime, violence, substance abuse and hopeless poverty
I thank the author for leaving us with the sense that the boys ultimately do escape their childhoods, not altogether unscathed, but in some ways the stronger for it.
I really enjoyed reading 1985, mainly because the characters felt so authentic. Obi’s life was deeply flawed and dysfunctional, but Dominic Hoey writes him with so much honesty that I found him relatable and easy to care for. Even though I have never lived in Auckland or experienced the situations Obi has, being around a similar age to him in 1985 gave the novel a sense of nostalgia for me.
The book deals with sad and heavy themes, but it’s often told with humour and a sharp comedic style that made it feel realistic rather than overly dark. That balance between sadness and comedy worked well and made the story engaging the whole way through.
I also loved the sense of community throughout the novel. Even though the neighbourhood and people were rough around the edges, there was a feeling that everyone looked out for each other, which gave the story a lot of warmth.
Another highlight for me was the poetry and politics woven into the story. They added depth without ever feeling forced or preachy. Overall, I found 1985 to be funny, emotional, nostalgic, and very real. It’s the kind of novel where the characters and atmosphere stay with you long after finishing it.
Published 2025
Penguin Random House
288 pages
READ FOR WOMEN’S PRIZE
Sybil Van Antwerp is an elderly former lawyer whose life is revealed through letters and emails to family, friends and acquaintances. When someone from her past reappears, Sybil is forced to revisit a painful period in her life. Through her correspondence, the novel explores ageing, grief, family, forgiveness and regret, and the ways our understanding of the past can change over a lifetime.
Imagine, the letters one has sent out into the world, the letters received back in turn, are like the pieces of a magnificent puzzle, or, a better metaphor, if dated, the links of a long chain, and even if those links are never put back together, which they will certainly never be, even if they remain for the rest of time dispersed across the earth like the fragile blown seeds of a dying dandelion, isn’t there something wonderful in that, to think that a story of one’s life is preserved in some way, that this very letter may one day mean something, even if it is a very small thing, to someone?
RACHEL
● I’m not a fan of epistolary novels. I find letters a bit of a cop out, used as a replacement for writing ability. And I find things are unrealistically over explained because there is no narrator to provide back story. For example “I came to your house on the weekend, we had shepherd’s pie for dinner and three glasses of wine and then I told you all about the affair” (not a quote from the book, couldn’t bear going back to find an example). This is not how people write letters. I’m pretty sure the receiver knows the sender came for dinner, they ate shepherd’s pie, drank wine and talked about the affair.
I was on the back foot from the outset with The Correspondent and events such as these didn’t endear it to me at any time.
It sounds strange but I felt like the characters were characters. At no time did they feel real to me and I did not feel connected to them, even when tragedy struck. Which is a shame, because the plot is full and well constructed with interesting twists, revelations and interconnected threads, but the format made it feel like the mechanics of the storytelling were visible. I want to get lost in a story and have to piece together the truths and lies, not be able to see how its been constructed and have the unreliable narrator so exposed. If this book had been presented in a more traditional format, where the author had the ability to build and layer emotional impact, it could have been a me type of book.
Published 2025
Crown Publishing
285 pages
READ FOR NZ BOOK AWARDS
In the rural reaches of Auckland, the women of the eclectic Gordon family gather for Christmas. Rita, the 50-year-old baby of the family, is planning to tell them she has cancer. Drifting between past and present, she considers the lives of women in their community and reckons with what it all means for her future and her family.
RACHEL:
● Hood’s Landing centres on Rita Gordon and her sprawling family over a celebration near Christmas for their matriarch’s birthday. Rita plans to reveal her cancer diagnosis but keeps delaying while the day’s events, arguments and memories get in the way. The whanau discuss the present and remember other influential women in their family and community, many of whom have also had cancer. It can be a bit sad reading about many deaths, but the large family and their ongoing love/gossip/bickering/laughter adds much life. Reading the book felt like sitting in a lazy boy in the corner of the room watching the conversations take place and observing the reactions at surprise events.
There is a strong focus on females as the support networks of families with male characters relegated to the periphery. Whakapapa, belonging, Māori identity, spirituality and inherited grief influence the group’s discourse.
This is Laura Vincent’s (Ngāti Māhanga, Ngāpuhi) debut, which makes me look forward to anything else she might write.
Published 2025
Āporo Press
256 pages
Recent Comments