READ FOR BOOKCLUB
Chosen by Rachel
The Tropic of Cancer was published in 1934 and was widely banned for its explicit sexual content, including for a 27 year period in the US. Its protagonist is a struggling writer living in Paris and is named for the author. The book is considered more than a novel, rather autobiographical fiction written as a collection of essays, anecdotes, poems and notations.
At the time, Henry Miller, both author and protagonist, is married to an American woman who lives in the US and of whom he thinks of only occasionally. Instead he ogles and makes reference to many other women, often in an objectifying manner. Instead of returning to his wife, Miller decides to remain in Paris, because the Parisian culture of the day and his attitude towards sexuality meshed well, as opposed to the American culture which was a lot more prim.
In Paris, Miller lives on the good will of others, taking advantage of people by begging for enough food and shelter to enable him to keep writing. Yet he manages to accumulate bohemian and beatnik friends, women of all walks of life, plenty of alcohol and fancy French food with ease. He is constantly writing about, thinking about or having sex, balancing the fine line of freedoms and restraint.
You can forgive a young c**t anything. A young c**t doesn’t have to have brains. They’re better without brains. But an old c**t , even if she’s brilliant, even if she’s the most charming woman in the world, nothing makes any difference. A young c**t is an investment; an old c**t is a dead loss. All they can do for you is buy you things. But that doesn’t put meat on their arms or juice between their legs.
Individual liberties and freedom of expression are thematic constructs but because his emphasis is an erotic expression his book has had a wide range of reactions. This includes how the four of us felt about it too. Some of the comments that flowed at bookclub were “narcissistic”, “tornado of destruction”, “revolutionary”, “controversial”, “anti-hero”, “offensive”, “rule-breaking”, “arsehole”. While the presentation and content could be appreciated as unique, it was hard to like Henry Miller the character when he was so clearly Henry Miller the person who treated people like this.
—–
Published 1934
Obelisk Press
318 pages
READ FOR BOOKCLUB
Chosen by Suzy
A fictionalised account set amongst the atrocities that occurred in Parihaka, Taranaki during the 1870s
The Parihaka Woman tells the story of Taranaki iwi who fought back against settlers and the confiscation of their lands with a programme of passive resistance. This grounding in fact is offset by the creation of protagonist Erenora, a heroine who takes on the Odyssean-type journey of rescuing her husband, Horitana, from capture.
Horitana is held in various prisons, providing a journey around the country, and a pacy saga with a cast of interesting side characters.
After receiving criticism for his previous novel, The Trowenna Sea, for apparent plagiarism, Ihimaera (Te Aitanga-a-Māhaki) has in this novel used a history teacher as a narrator, who quotes from reliable works to help explain the story of colonialism and atrocity in 1870s Taranaki. Thus the elements of fact and fiction are both clear but also woven together for a good yarn.
© I am always gobsmacked that the Parihaka story does not have more recognition in New Zealand. It is uplifting and devastating all at once. One of my favourite authors tells a stunning story of Parihaka and the good vs evil sentiments are strong. – Suzy
© I enjoyed reading more about one of the more reprehensible episodes in our country’s history and learned a lot. I did feel the story became too far-fetched as it neared its conclusion, however, it didn’t stop me turning pages! Excellent pace, well-crafted characters, historical accurate – definitely worth a read. – Rachel
—–
Published 2011
Vintage
318 pages
Poems studied:
Rain – Hone Tuwhare
No Ordinary Sun – Hone Tuwhare
Jerusalem Sonnet 1 – James K Baxter
In A Minute – Anna Jackson
Fantastic insight into these poems by Sophia. Everyone gravitated towards towards Rain, for some a long held love, for others a new awakening.”
Rain by Hone Tuwhare
I can hear you
making small holes
in the silence
rain
If I were deaf
the pores of my skin
would open to you
and shut
And I
should know you
by the lick of you
if I were blind
he something
special smell of you
when the sun cakes
the ground
the steady
drumroll sound
you make
when the wind drops
but if I
should not hear or
smell or feel or see
you
you would still
define me
disperse me
wash over me
rain
READ FOR BOOKCLUB
Chosen by Rachel
Kurt Vonnegut writes of his own experiences as a World War II prisoner in Slaughterhouse Five, in particular the bombing of Dresden.
On February 13, 1945, only months before the end of World War II, the Allies undertook a two-hour bombing of Dresden, Germany, an unarmed, historic city of no military importance. The attack killed 135,000 people. Vonnegut and other prisoners were held captive in an underground slaughterhouse there, the only reason they survived.
The novel’s protagonist, Billy Pilgrim, undergoes the same fate, coming to ground to find a flattened city. As a result Billy becomes unstuck in time and begins time travelling, a metaphor for his post-war PTSD. Without any forewarning, he finds himself suddenly transported to traumatic moments in his past or future.
At several points in the novel, including all of the opening chapter, Vonnegut addresses the reader directly, mentioning his own real-life experiences as a POW and discussing the difficulties he has had in writing about his war experiences. He also tells of his visit with fellow prisoner, Bernard O’Hare and how O’Hare’s wife urges Vonnegut not to glamorise war in the book he is writing. He promises that he will not.
As well as travelling to other moments in his life, the book’s protagonist Billy also travels to a fictional planet called Tralfamadore after being kidnapped by aliens. This mythical world is a product of Billy’s innocence and insanity and provides him a safe place in which he can escape the memories of humankind’s willingness to destroy itself.
And Lot’s wife, of course, was told not to look back where all those people and their homes had been. But she did look back, and I love her for that, because it was so human. So she was turned into a pillar of salt. So it goes.
This book was affecting for us all to read. It is cleverly written and there is much to admire stylistically. The autobiographical passages bookending Billy Pilgrim’s post-traumatic stress are constant reminders that fact and fiction are interwoven, giving the story more punch and grim effect. The fact that the author and protagonist are doomed to re-live terrible moments of their lives over and over, represented by Billy’s time travelling, is desperately sad but the author has ensured they are satirically comic at the same time. We couldn’t help but be touched.
—–
Published 1969
Delacorte
215 pages
READ FOR BOOKCLUB
Chosen by Suzy
The fictionalised true story of Paratene Te Manu’s journey to London in 1863 to meet with English royalty and gentry
© “Ngati Wai chief Paratene Te Manu is tupuna of Paula Morris (Ngati Wai). He was a warrior who won many battles, then converted to Christianity. In 1863, along with 13 other chiefs, he made the journey to England to meet Queen Victoria, to learn more about the English way of life and to showcase how well the European settlers were getting along with Māori.
“However the high hopes for the trip disintegrate into poverty, mistrust and humiliation, with the Māori chiefs having conflicted feelings over their engagement with, but also exploitation by, the English.
“Morris has made Paratene the narrator of the story. Twenty years after the journey, he is sitting for a portrait by the famed Gottfried Lindauer (which is used as the cover of the book) and while doing so recounts the experience and the lessons learned from the journey.
For what is a man advantaged, if he gain the whole world, and lose himself, or be cast away?’
© “I love good historical fiction and this book definitely ticked all of the boxes for me. Great insight and clever research pulls you into this story and it is great when you can be completely entertained and educated all at once.” – Suzy
© “I learnt a lot about an important part of New Zealand’s history by reading Rangatira. Not only that, I was entertained and moved by the well-paced narrative. What an amazing opportunity for Paula Morris to write something that is so important not only to her own history but to New Zealand’s as well. Beautiful cover to boot. Recommended reading.” – Rachel
—–
Published 2011
Penguin
304 pages
Any entity with five years’ history should be open to review: analysis and self review to continue with realised successes, and a thick-skinned willingness to shoulder the opinions and expectations of others.
For example, when we ask ourselves what are we doing right, we realise the answer is everything and we get back to reading 😉 What else would you expect when a group of A-type personalities get together?!
On the flipside there are a few comments from outsiders that pop up with regular frequency. There’s the ‘an excuse to get out of the house, eh?’ from the ladies, and the ‘oh, bookclub‘, with speech marks fingered in the air, from the guys. And from less enthusiastic bookclubbers: “do you never finish your books either? We just drink wine and talk all night”.
Hmmmm, actually we discuss books in depth, keep up to date with award nominees and get excited about new releases. We talk books all night and squeeze in a quick catch up before it gets too late and we all turn into pumpkins. While some consider such banter excessive or punishing, for us, bookclub is the highlight of the month.
As such, the four of us have settled into a wonderful rhythm and we continue to head in the right direction. This year we have chosen to continue to theme our book choices. Rachel’s looking into Banned and Controversial Books, Suzy has chosen New Zealand Writers, Jo will investigate the work of Iris Murdoch and Sophia introduces us to Poetry.
Rangatira – Paula Morris
Slaughterhouse Five – Kurt Vonnegut
Under The Net – Iris Murdoch
Poetry (Sophia’s NZ Favourites)
The Parihaka Woman – Witi Ihimaera
Tropic Of Cancer – Henry Miller
The Bell – Iris Murdoch
Poetry (Ways To Be A Successful Woman)
The Angel’s Cut – Elizabeth Knox
Of Mice & Men – John Steinbeck
A Servered Head – Iris Murdoch
The end of the year already!
This year we chose to lunch at The Grape Escape in Appleby and discuss the who, whys and whats of the year. We agreed it’s been a tumultuous year with the Christchurch earthquake and the Japanese tsunami and we were very pleased to have our feet on solid ground over the months.
At year’s start we agreed theming our book choices would be stabilising and connecting and after a year of shaky grounds, and friends and family severely impacted, we needed that stabilising force more than ever.
Theming our choices resulted in a reading list primarily of classics and home-grown works which resonated with us and reminded us about the importance of recording history. Even though we are living through traumatic times, the reaction to it, the learnings from it and the survival stories will one day be noted down as history for others to absorb and gain greater understanding of.
With our reading, we found the Russian classics heavy but rewarding; we relished the opportunity to learn more about Pacific writers, and agreed the entire content of Lolita was the most shocking reading moment of the year! There were a lot of punchy novels this year and here are our favourites:
Book of the year:
Sophia: Lolita
Jo: Lolita
Suzy: Freedom
Rachel: Lolita
Runner up:
Sophia: The Pregnant Widow
Jo: Sons For The Return Home
Suzy: Sons For The Return Home
Rachel: The Pregnant Widow
READ FOR BOOKCLUB
Chosen by Jo
Lolita is the story of a European scholar named Humbert Humbert who confesses to being obsessed with ‘nymphets’, ie young girls. He travels around America with his new wife and her pre-teen daughter Lolita and slowly becomes more and more obsessed with the 12 year old.
Humbert Humbert is a perpetrator but considers himself a victim and a wild romantic in his obsession with the young girl. Whereas most readers would find him a lecherous pervert. Yet somehow the author has brought this tragic character to life without causing the upset you’d expect.
When it was first published in 1955 in Paris, Lolita was banned for its controversial content. Critics described it as a pedophile’s ideal. Fans applauded the work’s originality and wit. The mixed-genre classic has since become widely read, accepted and championed.
Author Vladimir Nabokov argues that “what makes Lolita something more than either a case study of sexual perversion or pornographic titillation is the truly shocking fact that Humbert Humbert is a genius who, through the power of his artistry, actually persuades the reader that his memoir is a love story.”
The road now stretched across open country, and it occurred to me – not by way of protest, not as a symbol, or anything like that, but merely as a novel experience – that since I had disregarded all laws of humanity, I might as well disregard the rules of traffic. So I crossed to the left side of the highway and checked the feeling, and the feeling was good. It was a pleasant diaphragmal melting, with elements of diffused tactility, all this enhanced by the thought that nothing could be nearer to the elimination of basic physical laws than deliberately driving on the wrong site of the road.
✔ “I was fully prepared to hate this book given its awful theme, however I was pleasantly surprised at how beautifully told this story really is. It’s very clever with Humbert being our unreliable narrator and Delorus or Lolita’s voice is effectively silenced – the reader needs to read between the lines to understand the true nature of their relationship which is wholly ambiguous. A must read.” – Jo
✔ “It was Sophia who introduced me to Lolita years ago so I have her to thank for this perturbing read! The thing with Lolita though, is that it is the disturbing nature of it which makes it so grotesquely spectacular. It’s hard to know whether to love it or hate it, but there is the feeling that your emotions are being toyed with, by Humbert Humbert or by the author, or perhaps both. This is a book that messes with your mind – and that’s why it’s worth it.” – Rachel
—–
Published 1955
Penguin
368 pages
Recent Comments